Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 509-515, October 2010

Maternal body mass index and risk of testicular cancer in male offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Shama S. Alam

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Epidemiology & Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Cancer Epidemiology & Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Marie M. Cantwell

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Epidemiology & Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Chris R. Cardwell

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Epidemiology & Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Michael B. Cook

      Affiliations

    • Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Liam J. Murray

      Affiliations

    • Cancer Epidemiology & Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Accepted 2 July 2010. published online 23 July 2010.

Abstract 

Objectives: To date a number of studies have examined the association between maternal weight and testicular cancer risk although results have been largely inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the nature of this association. Methods: Search strategies were conducted in Ovid Medline (1950–2009), Embase (1980–2009), Web of Science (1970–2009), and CINAHL (1937–2009) using keywords for maternal weight (BMI) and testicular cancer. Results: The literature search produced 1689 hits from which 63 papers were extracted. Only 7 studies met the pre-defined criteria. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted. The combined unadjusted OR (95% CI) of testicular cancer in the highest reported category of maternal BMI compared with the moderate maternal BMI was 0.82 (0.65–1.02). The Cochran's Q P value was 0.82 and the corresponding I2 was 0%, both indicating very little variability among studies. The combined unadjusted OR (95% CI) for testicular cancer risk in the lowest reported category of maternal BMI compared to a moderate maternal BMI category was 0.88 (0.65–1.20). The Cochran's Q P value was 0.05 and the corresponding I2 was 54%, indicating evidence of statistical heterogeneity. The combined unadjusted OR (95% CI) of testicular cancer risk per unit increase in maternal BMI was 1.01 (0.97–1.06). The Cochran's Q test had a P value of 0.05 and the corresponding I2 was 55% indicating evidence of statistical heterogeneity. Conclusion: This meta-analysis, which included a small number of studies, showed that a higher maternal weight does not increase the risk of testicular cancer in male offspring. Though an inverse association between high maternal BMI and testicular cancer risk was detected, it was not statistically significant. Further primary studies with adjustment for appropriate confounders are required.

Keywords: Epidemiology, Maternal, Meta-analysis, Obesity, Pregnancy, Review, Systematic, Testicular neoplasms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1877-7821(10)00132-3

doi:10.1016/j.canep.2010.07.006

Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 509-515, October 2010