Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 382-387, August 2010

The validity and reliability of the Socioeconomic Status Instrument for assessing prostate cancer patients

  • Mfon Cyrus-David

      Affiliations

    • The Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, The Faculty Center, 1709 Dryden Road, Suite 1025, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    • The Department of Urology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCurrent address: The Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center (Medical School), 6410 Fannin Street, Suite 722 Houston, TX 77030, USA. Tel.: +1 832 325 7275; fax: +1 713 512 7140.

Accepted 30 April 2010. published online 18 May 2010.

Abstract 

Background: Because of the lack of consistency in the associations of the socioeconomic status (SES) of prostate cancer (PC) patients from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds with PC health outcomes, I created the Socioeconomic Status Instrument (SESI) from the Demographic and Health Access components of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2004 Questionnaires and the socioeconomic indices of the subjects’ residential counties to better assess the SES of PC patients. Methods: The SESI was tested on 220 consecutive subjects with pathologically confirmed PC at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, TX. A team that included an epidemiologist, a validation statistician/health services research scientist, and PC survivors assessed the content validity of the SESI. The construct validity of the SESI was assessed with factor analysis by extracting and analyzing 5 principal components based on the subjects’ individual responses on the assessment: county socioeconomic characteristics, individual socioeconomic characteristics, financial distress, increased domestic burden with limited earnings, and affluence. The internal consistency reliability of the SESI was assessed with Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Results: Based on the reviews of the SESI, all of the initial 10 items were retained. The correlations between individual responses on the SESI were similar to the results of previous studies. The 5 principal components that I assessed accounted for 71.5% of the variance. Factor loadings ranged from 0.66 to 0.98 and communalities ranged from 0.55 to 0.94. County socioeconomic characteristics accounted for 22.6% of the variance, whereas individual socioeconomic characteristics accounted for 14.6% of the variance. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.78. Conclusions: The SESI is valid and reliable. Accurate measurements of the SES of PC patients would provide better guidance for future research and care deliveries.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Reliability, Socioeconomic status, Validity, Instrument

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1877-7821(10)00082-2

doi:10.1016/j.canep.2010.04.020

Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 382-387, August 2010