Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 388-399, August 2010

Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium and cancers of the gastrointestinal tract: A meta-analysis

  • Nicole M. Gatto

      Affiliations

    • ToxStrategies, Inc., Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Michael A. Kelsh

      Affiliations

    • Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Diem Ha Mai

      Affiliations

    • Exponent, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Mina Suh

      Affiliations

    • Exponent, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
  • ,
  • Deborah M. Proctor

      Affiliations

    • ToxStrategies, Inc., Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: ToxStrategies, Inc., 30021 Tomas St., Suite 300, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688, United States. Tel.: +1 949 459 2140; fax: +1 949 459 2142.

Accepted 23 March 2010. published online 08 April 2010.

Abstract 

Introduction: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of oral cavity, esophageal, stomach, small intestine, colon, and rectal cancers among workers occupationally exposed to Cr(VI). Methods: Using PubMed, studies published from 1950 to 2009 evaluating the relationship between Cr(VI) exposure and GI cancers were identified. Measures of effect and variability were extracted from 32 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, and meta-analysis summary relative risk measures were calculated using random effects models and inverse variance weighting methods. Results: Meta-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were, for cancer of the: oral cavity [1.02 (95% CI=0.77–1.34)]; esophagus [1.17 (95% CI=0.90–1.51)]; stomach [1.09 (95% CI=0.93–1.28)]; colon [0.89 (95% CI=0.70–1.12)]; and rectum [1.17 (95% CI=0.98–1.39)]. Analyses of more highly exposed subgroups included in the studies or subgroups based on geographic region or by industry with recognized Cr(VI) exposures (welding, chrome plating, chromate production, and pigment production) did not result in elevated meta-SMRs except for esophageal cancer among US cohorts [meta-SMR=1.49 (95% CI=1.06–2.09)]. However, that finding was based on a subgroup of only four studies, one of which was a PMR study. Potential confounding by socioeconomic status (SES), diet and/or smoking, or limitations due to the healthy-worker effect (HWE) were evaluated, and while smoking, diet and SES may be important factors that may have upwardly biased the meta-SMRs, HWE is not likely to have significantly affected the summary results. None of three studies reporting small intestine cancers observed a statistically significant increased risk. Discussion: These meta-analyses and literature review indicate that Cr(VI)-exposed workers are not at a greater risk of GI cancers than the general population.

Keywords: Cancer, Hexavalent chromium, Gastrointestinal, Oral cavity, Esophageal, Stomach, Colon, Rectal, Intestine, Occupational, Meta-analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1877-7821(10)00053-6

doi:10.1016/j.canep.2010.03.013

Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 388-399, August 2010