Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 434-441 , August 2010

Print news coverage of cancer: What prevention messages are conveyed when screening is newsworthy?

  • Katherine Clegg Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Rm 726, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States. Tel.: +1 410 502 0025; fax: +1 410 955 7241.
    • ,
  • Elizabeth Edsall Kromm

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
    • Howard County Health Department, 7178 Columbia Gateway Drive, Columbia, MD 21046, United States
    • ,
  • Ann Carroll Klassen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
    • Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States

,Accepted 10 February 2010.

References 

  1. Stein C, Colditz GA. Modifiable risk factors for cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:299–303
  2. In:  Stewart BW,  Kleihues P editor. World cancer report. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2003;
  3. Grunfeld E, Zitzelsberger L, Evans WK, Cameron R, Hayter C, Berman N, et al. Better knowledge translation for effective cancer control: a priority for action. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(5):503–510
  4. Woolf S. Potential of screening to reduce the burden of cancer. In:  Curry SJ,  Byers T,  Hewitt M editor. Fulfilling the potential for cancer prevention and early detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003;p. 156–223
  5. Dixon H, Scully M, Wakefield M, Murphy M. The prostate screening debate: public reaction to medical controversy in the media. Public Underst Sci. 2008;[online first October 1, 2008], doi: 10.1177/0963662507078020
  6. Lupton D. Femininity, responsibility and the technological imperative—discourses on breast cancer in the Australian Press. Int J Health Serv. 1994;24:73–89
  7. Brown P, Zavestoski S, McCormick S, Mandelbaum J, Luebke T. Print media coverage of environmental causation of breast cancer. Sociol Health Illness. 2001;23(6):747–775
  8. Johnson JD, Meischke H. Women's preferences for cancer-related information from specific types of mass media. Health Care Women Int. 1994;15(1):23–30
  9. Meissner HI, Potosky AL, Convissor R. How sources of health information relate to knowledge and use of cancer screening exams. J Community Health. 1992;17(3):153–165
  10. Wright WR. Mass media as a source of medical information. J Commun. 1975;25:171–173
  11. Edsall Kromm E, Smith K, Singer R. Survivors on cancer: the portrayal of survivors in print news. J Cancer Survivorship. 2007;1(4):1932–2259
  12. Halpin M, Phillips M, Oliffe J. Prostate cancer stories in the Canadian print media: representations of illness, disease and masculinities. Sociol Health Illness. 2009;31(2):155–169
  13. Han PK, Moser RP, Klein WM. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey. Health Expect. 2007;10:321–336
  14. Jones S. Coverage of breast cancer in the Australian print media—does advertising and editorial coverage reflect correct social marketing messages?. J Health Commun. 2004;9:309–325
  15. Mavroforou A, Mavrophoros D, Michalodimitrakis E. Screening mammography, public perceptions, and medical liability. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57(3):428–435
  16. Moriarty C, Stryker J. Prevention and screening efficacy messages in newspaper accounts of cancer. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(3):487–498
  17. Katz ML, Sheridan S, Pignone M, Lewis C, Battle J, Gollop C, et al. Prostate and colon cancer screening messages in popular magazines. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(8):843–848
  18. Schwartz L, Woloshin S. News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287:3136–3142
  19. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2005. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2005;
  20. Altheide D. Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996;
  21. Woodberry W. Cancer awareness van. Free exams set at mobile unit. New York Daily News; September 16, 2005.
  22. Hobson K. Spot it and stop it before it starts. U.S. News and World Reports; September 26, 2005.
  23. Scanlon B. Mammography screening van ready to hit the road. Rocky Mountain News; September 23, 2005.
  24. Szabo L. Mammograms may boost survival rates. USA Today; August 17, 2005.
  25. Maugh T. For many, digital mammograms more effective, researchers find. Los Angeles Times; September 17, 2005.
  26. Rubin, R. Digital mammograms are better, but scarce. USA Today; September 19, 2005.
  27. Kranhold K. Digital mammography excel in study. Wall Street Journal; September 17, 2005.
  28. Davis R. Mammography goes digital. Wall Street Journal; June 28, 2005.
  29. Morgan H. Lost pal, and takes prostate test. New York Daily News; June 24, 2005.
  30. Ryckman L. Prostate screening saves lives; CU Center offering week of free exams. Rocky Mountain News; September 6, 2005.
  31. This time, don’t ignore your senators. Rocky Mountain News; June 17, 2005.
  32. Parker-Pope T. Health mailbox. Wall Street Journal; June 21, 2005.
  33. Szabo L. Study casts new doubts on prostate cancer test. USA Today; July 6, 2005.
  34. Reuters. Prostate cancer test questioned; researchers say PSA screening yields many false results. Washington Post; July 6, 2005.
  35. Marsa L. Getting answers on tape; an experimental skin test using a special adhesive could provide more accurate screening results for prostate cancer. Los Angeles Times; August 29, 2005.
  36. Forelle C. Prostate cancer is more precise than PSA test, study says. Wall Street Journal; September 22, 2005.
  37. Question and answers: about prostate-specific antigen. USA Today; July 6, 2005.
  38. Siegel M. Recommendations for women at risk. Washington Post; June 28, 2005.
  39. Woloshin S, Schwartz L. Interactions. The Washington Post; July 12, 2005.
  40. Brody, J What an extra eye on cancer can do for you. New York Times; August 16, 2005.
  41. Wood P. Celebrities put lung cancer in spotlight. The Annapolis Capital; August 12, 2005.
  42. Mulshine JL. Letter to the editor. Newsweek; September 12, 2005.
  43. Woloshin S, Schwartz L, Welch G. Warned, but worse off. New York Times; August 22, 2005.
  44. Foreman J. To reduce risk, don’t start smoking again. The Baltimore Sun; August 19, 2005.
  45. Clarke JN, Everest MM. Cancer in the mass print media: fear, uncertainty and the medical model. Social Sci Med. 2006;62(10):2591–2600
  46. Mazzone P, Obuchowski N, Mekhail T, Meziane M, Ahmad M. Lung cancer screening: is it time for a change in policy?. Clev Clin J Med. 2007;74(6):441–448
  47. Niederdeppe J, Levy A. Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:998–1003
  48. Chew F, Mandelbaum-Schmid J, Gao SK. Can health journalists bridge the state-of-the-science gap in mammography guidelines?. Sci Commun. 2006;27(3):331–351

PII: S1877-7821(10)00024-X

doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.02.006

Cancer Epidemiology
Volume 34, Issue 4 , Pages 434-441 , August 2010

Article Tools